9.28.2005

"You want me to be some kind of superhero..."


In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Democrats began pushing for an independent, 9/11-style investigation into the hurricane response. Republicans, with the White House leading the charge, opposed that style of investigation, and instead have opened their own Congressional hearings.

Keep in mind that Republicans, with the White House at the head, opposed the original 9/11 commission as well.

Comes out today that 80% of United States citizens believe that an independent Katrina investigation is the way to go.

Democrats can't let this one go. There are a few issues where it's better to let the Administration have its way - Judge Robers, for example. But making sure that the US has a full accounting of everything that went wrong with the preparation and response to Hurricane Katrina, at every level, is not something that the Party should let its officials ignore.

Time to start agitating.

(story here.)

9.13.2005

Shooting at the walls of ignorance


I was recently conversing with one of my more conservative acquaintances about the realities of Hurricane Katrina, and how I thought that the root problem was abject poverty. Believe it or not, my friend (let's call him Tom) agreed that poverty was the problem, the reason that so many people were trapped for so long in the hideous environs of the Superdome and Convention Center in New Orleans.

But then ignorance raised its ugly head.

"Whose fault is it," he asked, "that these people spend their welfare checks on crack, rather than good cars? Why should the Federal government come in and save these people who don't care about their own basic survival? Why can't people in poverty just get a damn job?"

Get a job? What jobs? Have you been to, say, North St. Louis, or the south side of Chicago? Watts? There are NO jobs to be had in those areas. I live in St. Louis, and I can tell you that there aren't even any freaking grocery stores for miles around. There aren't any jobs to be had.

And why is it that people, very often on the right, assume that just because somebody lives in poverty, they're a crackhead? Or that they waste their money? More often than not, they don't HAVE money to waste.

Poverty is a circular problem - if you grow up poor, chances are very good that you will die poor. And that your children will do the same. And so on and so forth until the end of time. Sure, some people get out, and we celebrate them as great stories, inspirations, yadda yadda yadda. But they are the exception, and not the rule.

What are the odds that righties are in favor of job-training programs? Learn-to-work programs, job fairs, this that and the other thing? I'm sure most conservatives know they'd almost have to be government-funded; chances are good that very few companies would be willing to foot the bill for programs like that, when they can just ask middle-class folks to work for them, without having to invest in a program to teach people who want to work and who want job skills but just don't have that knowledge.

And even WITH that knowledge, where would they work? Someplace miles away. Would you be willing to ride an hour on a city bus each way to work? Try it for a week. Then tell me you'd be willing to do it for months at a time, until you can save up the money to buy and insure a car. And maintain that car. It's very difficult, something that people who have never known true need just never seem to realize.

And let's pretend you're poor and want to move. Fine, go for it. But save up for a damage deposit on an apartment closer to work - probably 500 bucks, plus first month's rent due before you move in. And, in a lot of cities, you'll have to pay another hundred bucks for an apartment inspection by the city. Call that 1200 bucks, all told. I'd be impressed if you can save up for that on a wage less than 10 bucks an hour without getting discouraged. Oh, and don't forget to eat.

Forget about going to college. If your school system is unaccredited, and even if you graduate from high school, you can't get into most schools. So, tough nuts, I guess, if you're too poor to go to Country Day.

The root cause of poverty isn't the people, it's the lack of jobs and good role models in the home - folks who have jobs, work hard, et cetera. That's not because the poor are crackheads - it's because government and private industry, together, have failed to educate citizens in and around the poorest areas of cities and have an unwillingness to invest in those neighborhoods. Government has abandoned them, and industry is fearful of them. And the end result is that what we see when the rich abandon a town is that the poor, who were swept under the rug so long ago, still exist and are real people, just as scared as the middle and upper classes - and when the rug is pulled up, we realize it's us who've been pushing them aside.

9.02.2005

Just a Quick Link


Are you interested in making a donation to a relief fund for Hurricane Katrina? If so, click here:
Liberal Blogs for Hurricane Relief

9.01.2005

Who's really to blame


In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, there are few things that we really need to occupy our minds beyond the huge scope of devastation and human loss that Katrina and its (her?) resultant floods caused. Look at the New Orleans Convention center, for example. (link for the lazy)

But one thing that everyone around the nation will undoubtedly rally around is the increase in gas prices. In Saint Louis, Missouri, gas prices rose sixty cents between Monday evening and Tuesday evening, when the scope of the damage became clear to gas stations and fuel distributors.

Frequently, and throughout the summer, those on the right have blamed environmentalists and liberals in general for the increase in prices. Nevermind that environmentalists are far less likely to drive 12 mile-per-gallon Ford Excursions than, say, a Toyota Prius, or even a sensible Civic. Increased demand increases prices, we should all know that by now.

In reality, however, the real root cause of the gas crunch is refinery operation. Most refineries are now operating at nearly 95% capacity in the US, meaning that there's not a lot of wiggle room if, say, one refinery were to be shut down for one reason or another.

There are currently 149 refineries that are theoretically operating in the US, including on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico - most of those are offline right now while oil companies figure out how to turn them back on. So, 149 refineries operating at 95% capacity...we should just build more refineries, right?

Not exactly. The last refinery built in the US was built in 1976, nearly 30 years ago.

Alone, that fact might put a lot of weight behind the idea that environmental regulations are to blame for the dearth of refineries in the US. Alone, I'd certainly agree, especially as my wallet takes a beating.

BUT....

In 1981, there were 324 refineries operating in the US. Doing the math means that 175 refineries have been closed just in the last 24 years. Part of that was natural slack in the system that came from low demand, and therefore low prices. But there's no reason that some of the refineries couldn't have been kept open, or at least been kept intact, in the event of a demand crunch.

Well, there is one reason: it would have been good for profits of oil companies to create a demand crunch as they merged together to form superlarge conglomerates. They had excess refining capacity when they existed as independent companies, and they closed some refineries when they merged.

And that's what has happened: oil company profits are higher than they've ever been, and we're paying more at the pump than we ever have before, and it's because refineries have been closed, not because there's been no construction. It's not environmentalists' fault that gas is over three bucks a gallon.

It's the oil companies' policies. Profit is the name of the game. And while that's not a bad thing by any stretch of the imagination, the unwillingness of these companies to cut into profits a little bit and make things easier for consumers here in the US does make you ask a lot of questions as to what's more important: the long-term health of the American economy, or the short-term price of your own shares.